校花虐肛

洛基（Eric Stoltz 饰）患有基因疾病，自四岁以来头骨不断生长，这让他的面庞硕大怪异，所幸学习能力未受疾病妨碍。嬉皮士母亲弗洛伦斯（Cher 饰）所做的不但是将洛基独力养大，更培养成他乐观的性格。一班摩托骑士朋友围绕在这对母子周围，给予洛基小集体的支持。洛基在九年级学校生涯中很快凭借自己的优秀表现扭转了新同学们对自己的观感，另一方面弗洛伦斯却因生活压力陷入对毒品的依赖，骑士戈尔与儿子的温情让她停止自暴自弃，但逐渐成人的洛基开始为可望不可即的爱情神伤……本片获1985年戛纳电影节最佳女演员奖，1986年奥斯卡最佳化妆奖。根据洛基·丹尼斯（Rocky Dennis）的真实故事改编。

矶部一家六口人搬到新的房子，自搬入之日起，矶部家次子笃平的性情便开始发生转变。随着又一次司法考试的失败，笃平在圣诞前夜将母亲、兄长、嫂子以及两个侄女残忍杀害，随后带着小侄女未来的头颅来到深山野岭，上吊自杀。死前留下了录有古怪留言的录音带。凶案发生第二天，快递员田宫（铃木裕树 饰）送货至矶部家，在一系列诡异事件后，他发现了凶案现场，却从此被拿着篮球的白色老女的怨灵所纠缠；由于怨灵作祟，未来的小学同学小茜也在凶案次日失去了父亲（宫川一朗太 饰）。这起灭门惨案至此告一段落，但在七年之后，已经上了高中的小茜（南明奈 饰）再次被带回旧日的噩梦之中……本片为日本恐怖片《咒怨》系列的十周年纪念作品第一部，另一部名为《黑少女》。

藝術家于貞身陷抄襲官司時，美術館策展人振浩邀請她參加特別展覽，她為了把握機會而與振浩發生關係。同時，于貞的朋友素英突然回國，擅自住進她與男友亨重的公寓，在得知于貞的不倫情事後，竟提議色誘亨重並拍下證據，以防東窗事發。另外，美術館老闆想找亨重取代振浩，兩人為此互相較勁，振浩還找上曾是知名藝術家的素英。四人各自暗藏心機，這場爾虞我詐的遊戲將會由誰勝出呢？

Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.