交换美妇系列94部分

神秘的全球性灾难爆发，一位独自驻扎北极的科学家竭力与一群返回地球的宇航员取得联系，他们正要回到惨遭神秘灾难重创的地球。

噗通入水，愛嘉比湘琪游快了一點，她們是最好的朋 友，但比賽裡只有對手。湘琪的發育比愛嘉慢了一些， 瘦小的她想靠體保生名額繼續升學。女孩迎來初經， 成熟了身體，萌出了心機，友情與妒意分列泳池畔台， 她們在槍響前大口呼吸，哨音後振臂向前，在藍色青 春池水裡誰也無法回頭。

从少年感化院出来的不良少年卢斌被分配到一家烹饪学校学习。沉默寡言又性格倔强的卢斌刚被分配到导师李佩荣的名下第三天，学校财务准备发给老师的奖金就不翼而飞了。几个老师纷纷把怀疑的目光投向有前科的卢斌。而身为导师的李佩荣虽然对卢斌管教严厉，同时又深深地同情着这个不幸的孩子。如果钱真的是卢斌所偷，他将被烹饪学校开除。两个老师决定暗中调查此案，然而，李佩荣不仅要面对自己对卢斌恨铁不成钢的怀疑，还要面对突如其来的秘密和真相。

《父母心》是獨立電影人約翰．卡薩維蒂於六十年代遇上荷里活製片之產物。故事講及精神科醫生畢蘭加士打聘請了來自音樂學院的朱迪．格蘭，於兒童精神病院利用嶄新手法教導外界認為無可救助的精神病兒童吉娜．羅蘭茲。片中兒童皆來自加州其中一間兒童精神中心，將這班被遺忘的一群真實地呈現在觀眾面前。都市人面對種種生活壓力，大量社會問題備受關注。當面對社會的陰暗面時，主流社會最初會以迴避的態度面對，而經過大量之社會運動、媒體報導等以令社會更多元、開放，以積極的態度去面對。這種社會心態轉變可能用上半個世紀，甚至更長時間。其中兒童問題從來都是一個敏感議題，而卡薩維蒂早在六十年代已利用光影之間揭示社會鮮為人知的一面，廣泛引起主流社會討論。卡薩維蒂是一位極具才華的獨立電影導演，游走於荷里活製作和獨立電影之間，利用偏鋒路線打破固有荷里活電影記事模式，注重強烈的演員性格去反映現實社會。本片被評為卡氏最為大膽作品之一，其寫實性令人嘆為觀止，創新起用精神病兒童在作品中表演。深刻地勾勒出這批非主流兒童的困境，打破大眾對他們的形象。而憑藉這齣先驅作品，我們更可以反思現時香港社會在這方面的缺失。As a result of co-operation between Cassavetes and Hollywood's producers, A Child is Waiting was shown in the 1960s. Burt Lancaster, a psychiatrist, hires Judy Garland to work at a psychiatric facility for children. Garland uses an innovative method to teach a mentally retarded child, Gena Rowland, who the world has turned its back on. Patients in the film were from a real life psychiatric institution, where this group of forsaken children was being honestly presented to the audience.City life is filled with all sorts of stress and problems. When facing the dark side of society, the mainstream community usually takes refuge in escapism. It is only after waves of social movements and media coverage that the people's attitudes about these problems would change and that they would take affirmative action about it. This process might take half century or longer. Children issue has always been a sensitive subject, yet Cassavetes has already chosen to show its untold stories in his film in the early sixties to arouse public discussion.Cassavetes was a talented independent filmmaker who also engaged in Hollywood productions. His works emphasized on his actors, and through their characters, instead of traditional storytelling techniques, explored the realities of society. This film was hailed as the most daring piece of Cassavetes' works. Its realism was praised, especially of his inclusion of real life patients. The patients' difficulties were profoundly illustrated so as to eradicate the public's prejudice against them. From this avant-garde work, we can even reconsider the situation of these issues in Hong Kong.source: Hong Kong Arts Centre