内裤之穴 电影

剧情简介　　缘山是秦岭深处的一名铁路巡轨员。在缘山工作的班组，十几个巡轨员分段负责，相互之间很少有见面的时候，惟一能给他们带来外面世界的，是过往这里的机车。在一座隧道的旁边，是缘山独自生活的红泥屋，也是缘山的家。缘山在这里用脚步丈量着伸向远方的铁轨，迎来朝霞、送走夕阳，生活过得既宁静又简单。缘山记恨着父亲。父亲每次来看望缘山，尽管都带来缘山小时候最爱吃的东西，但缘山从来不跟父亲说一句话。在父亲刚刚回去的一个午后，缘山在巡轨途中发现一个蜷缩在涵洞里避雨的姑娘。缘山将姑娘带回自己的红泥屋，给姑娘打水洗脚，找出自己的干衣服让姑娘换洗，留姑娘在红泥屋过夜。

19世纪的英国，名门贵族凡多姆海威家的执事塞巴斯蒂安·米卡利斯跟随着13岁的主人夏尔·凡多姆海威作为“女王的番犬”每天都背负着黑社会的肮脏工作。有天，在一次煞有介事的私语中他们得知了关于「死者复生」的传闻。为了调查事情真相，塞巴斯蒂安他们进到了豪华客船「坎帕尼亚号」，等待他们的到底是——（转自百度百科）

电影讲述了矛盾重重的“不靠谱”父亲和“超正经”女儿因一张神奇的彩票意外互换身体后。混混父亲“变”女儿重返青春、祸乱校园，学霸女儿“变”父亲整顿胡同儿江湖。他们在这又尬又囧的爆笑错位生活中真正走近彼此，这是一个“骄傲女儿”和一个“失败父亲”的讲和，放过对方，也反省自己。

Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.